
Reflecting on a the horns of a dilemma, or something. Two syndromes:
1) The good is the enemy of the great:
Person A: "You know what? It would take a lot of focus and effort and teamwork, but we could go for this Big, Hairy, Audacious Goal!"
Person B: "Really? But why...? These small, hairless, inoffensive occupations that we're currently busy with are getting us by just fine."
2) The great is the enemy of the good:
Person A: "Hey! Look at this cool thing I accomplished!"
Person B: "What?? Why did you waste time doing that? We TOTALLY could have accomplished a MIND-BENDINGLY AWESOME version of that!!!!!"
Person A: "Oh. But, we weren't. And we haven't. And I did this. And it's pretty cool."
[Six months later....]
Person A: "Hmm. Glad I didn't wait around for B's MIND-BENDINGLY AWESOME version, or we'd still have nuttin' at all...."
I wonder:
It seems to me that good and great are both pretty nifty. And initiative trumps nay-saying almost every time. So can't we all just get along? (Probably not.)
image by Tony the Misfit (rights)
Just a personal web journal, often on theological topics. It's "rude" in three senses: "crude" in that I have little formal theological training; "offensive" in that the things I write unintentionally tick folks off sometimes, and "rough" in the form of occasional spicy language. If any of that turns you off, then I'm sorry to see you go. Otherwise, welcome!
